1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:05,650 [Music] 2 00:00:11,350 --> 00:00:07,940 the study that I'll be talking about 3 00:00:13,339 --> 00:00:11,360 today in relation to the entire body of 4 00:00:17,330 --> 00:00:13,349 previous mediumship research which is 5 00:00:19,580 --> 00:00:17,340 not terribly large has several upgrades 6 00:00:22,330 --> 00:00:19,590 I guess we could call them the mediums 7 00:00:24,080 --> 00:00:22,340 that participated in this study are 8 00:00:26,779 --> 00:00:24,090 prescreened and certified 9 00:00:29,750 --> 00:00:26,789 is just claimant mediums that 10 00:00:31,939 --> 00:00:29,760 participate in other studies each item 11 00:00:34,190 --> 00:00:31,949 in each reading was scored for accuracy 12 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:34,200 in the study and there are additional 13 00:00:39,340 --> 00:00:36,690 levels of blinding beyond what has been 14 00:00:42,709 --> 00:00:39,350 previously reported the protocol that we 15 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:42,719 uses quintuple blind has five levels of 16 00:00:48,380 --> 00:00:45,210 controls that account for all the normal 17 00:00:49,790 --> 00:00:48,390 local sensory explanations for the 18 00:00:53,540 --> 00:00:49,800 accuracy of the statements that the 19 00:00:55,250 --> 00:00:53,550 mediums provide so in this quintuple 20 00:00:57,290 --> 00:00:55,260 blind protocol we start with the medium 21 00:00:58,430 --> 00:00:57,300 but it's not any old medium off the 22 00:01:01,549 --> 00:00:58,440 street 23 00:01:03,529 --> 00:01:01,559 we like I said we pre-screen our mediums 24 00:01:06,050 --> 00:01:03,539 David Fontana author of the book is 25 00:01:07,969 --> 00:01:06,060 there an afterlife emphasized the quote 26 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:07,979 obvious necessity to have trial runs 27 00:01:12,109 --> 00:01:10,170 with mediums and then to work only with 28 00:01:15,590 --> 00:01:12,119 those mediums who appear to perform well 29 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:15,600 so at the wind bridge Institute we use 30 00:01:21,380 --> 00:01:17,490 an eight step screening and training 31 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:21,390 procedure at the end of which if someone 32 00:01:25,850 --> 00:01:23,490 successfully completes these eight steps 33 00:01:28,249 --> 00:01:25,860 then they're termed a wind bird 34 00:01:30,649 --> 00:01:28,259 certified research medium so for this 35 00:01:32,929 --> 00:01:30,659 study the the most important step is 36 00:01:37,010 --> 00:01:32,939 step five which are the test readings 37 00:01:39,530 --> 00:01:37,020 which use protocols that mimic what the 38 00:01:41,679 --> 00:01:39,540 mediums go on to participate in in the 39 00:01:45,260 --> 00:01:41,689 study that I'll be talking about today 40 00:01:48,710 --> 00:01:45,270 so we start in this protocol with a 41 00:01:51,889 --> 00:01:48,720 blinded research medium and at a 42 00:01:53,569 --> 00:01:51,899 scheduled time I call the medium during 43 00:01:56,200 --> 00:01:53,579 the reading it's just the medium and me 44 00:01:59,109 --> 00:01:56,210 on the phone there's no sitter involved 45 00:02:02,810 --> 00:01:59,119 the mediums are all over the country and 46 00:02:05,060 --> 00:02:02,820 I have been emailed the first name of a 47 00:02:07,969 --> 00:02:05,070 deceased person a discs are knit by a 48 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:07,979 research assistant and so all that the 49 00:02:11,690 --> 00:02:09,810 medium and I have is this first name of 50 00:02:12,750 --> 00:02:11,700 the deceased person so I give the name 51 00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:12,760 to the media 52 00:02:16,500 --> 00:02:14,890 and then she does a reading so the 53 00:02:18,420 --> 00:02:16,510 discourage name is Susie and then we do 54 00:02:20,460 --> 00:02:18,430 a Susie reading and then on a different 55 00:02:23,699 --> 00:02:20,470 day we have a different name we do it 56 00:02:25,380 --> 00:02:23,709 again during those readings I ask the 57 00:02:27,059 --> 00:02:25,390 medium to report the answers to these 58 00:02:28,860 --> 00:02:27,069 four questions what did the discarnate 59 00:02:30,809 --> 00:02:28,870 look like in his or her physical life 60 00:02:32,430 --> 00:02:30,819 describe the personality of the 61 00:02:34,979 --> 00:02:32,440 discarnate what were the discarnate 62 00:02:37,589 --> 00:02:34,989 hobbies activities or interests and what 63 00:02:39,569 --> 00:02:37,599 was the discarnates cause of death so 64 00:02:42,780 --> 00:02:39,579 after the readings take place then I 65 00:02:46,170 --> 00:02:42,790 transcribe and format each reading into 66 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:46,180 a list of numbered items and I have 67 00:02:50,100 --> 00:02:47,890 removed all reference to either of the 68 00:02:53,460 --> 00:02:50,110 names in either of the readings and then 69 00:02:55,949 --> 00:02:53,470 each of those lists of items is sent to 70 00:02:58,259 --> 00:02:55,959 each of the two associated sitters the 71 00:03:00,360 --> 00:02:58,269 living people who have lost and want to 72 00:03:03,059 --> 00:03:00,370 hear from the two discarnate so each of 73 00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:03,069 the two readings are sent to each of the 74 00:03:10,229 --> 00:03:08,650 two sitters so the each sitter serves as 75 00:03:12,869 --> 00:03:10,239 a control for the other sitters so each 76 00:03:14,940 --> 00:03:12,879 sitter scores a target reading and a 77 00:03:16,530 --> 00:03:14,950 decoy reading but they don't know which 78 00:03:20,220 --> 00:03:16,540 is which because they're just called a 79 00:03:24,690 --> 00:03:20,230 and B so for each two readings we get 80 00:03:26,819 --> 00:03:24,700 two sets of scores and during scoring 81 00:03:30,180 --> 00:03:26,829 the sitters answer this question about 82 00:03:32,550 --> 00:03:30,190 each item in each reading so how well 83 00:03:35,640 --> 00:03:32,560 does the information fit and they can 84 00:03:37,289 --> 00:03:35,650 score it as obvious fit fit requiring 85 00:03:40,289 --> 00:03:37,299 minimal or more than minimal 86 00:03:43,199 --> 00:03:40,299 interpretation fit it fits someone other 87 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:43,209 than the name discarnate or it doesn't 88 00:03:47,430 --> 00:03:45,130 fit at all or I don't know I don't have 89 00:03:50,940 --> 00:03:47,440 enough information to gauge the accuracy 90 00:03:55,530 --> 00:03:50,950 of the statement when we calculate the 91 00:03:59,099 --> 00:03:55,540 percent accuracy we tally up the items 92 00:04:00,750 --> 00:03:59,109 that were scored obvious fits fits 93 00:04:02,970 --> 00:04:00,760 requiring minimal interpretation that we 94 00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:02,980 divide that by the total items minus the 95 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:04,810 I don't knows and then with that's the 96 00:04:10,770 --> 00:04:06,730 number that we call hits those are the 97 00:04:12,930 --> 00:04:10,780 that's the percent accuracy at the end 98 00:04:15,089 --> 00:04:12,940 of the of scoring each item in the 99 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:15,099 reading The Sitter also gives the entire 100 00:04:20,849 --> 00:04:19,090 reading of one score from 0 to 6 of 6 101 00:04:22,649 --> 00:04:20,859 being excellent reading including strong 102 00:04:24,209 --> 00:04:22,659 aspects of communication and with 103 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:24,219 essentially no incorrect information 104 00:04:26,390 --> 00:04:25,690 down to 0 105 00:04:28,540 --> 00:04:26,400 which is 106 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:28,550 correct information or communication and 107 00:04:31,909 --> 00:04:30,810 then we asked each sitter pick the 108 00:04:33,890 --> 00:04:31,919 reading which seems to be more 109 00:04:35,750 --> 00:04:33,900 applicable to you even if they both seem 110 00:04:39,710 --> 00:04:35,760 equally applicable or not applicable 111 00:04:41,870 --> 00:04:39,720 pick one so it's a it's a there's item 112 00:04:43,879 --> 00:04:41,880 scores whole reading scores and then 113 00:04:48,290 --> 00:04:43,889 forced choice though it's all the data 114 00:04:52,010 --> 00:04:48,300 that we collect for each reading so as 115 00:04:55,939 --> 00:04:52,020 an example in this case a sitter one 116 00:04:58,610 --> 00:04:55,949 might give a 5 and B a 2 and 2 might 117 00:05:02,510 --> 00:04:58,620 give a a 1 and B 4 and then they might 118 00:05:04,760 --> 00:05:02,520 make these choices that's a kind of 119 00:05:08,870 --> 00:05:04,770 indicative of the kind of numbers that 120 00:05:12,430 --> 00:05:08,880 we see so the five levels of blinding in 121 00:05:14,719 --> 00:05:12,440 this quintuple blinded protocol the 122 00:05:16,550 --> 00:05:14,729 research medium is blinded to all 123 00:05:19,580 --> 00:05:16,560 information about the sitters or the 124 00:05:25,460 --> 00:05:19,590 discarnates before during and after the 125 00:05:27,290 --> 00:05:25,470 reading the the sitters are again each 126 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:27,300 blinded to the origin of the reading 127 00:05:30,290 --> 00:05:28,530 during scoring again they don't know 128 00:05:35,810 --> 00:05:30,300 which one's the target and which one's 129 00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:35,820 the decoy the experimenter who interacts 130 00:05:40,190 --> 00:05:38,250 with the sitters initially during 131 00:05:42,230 --> 00:05:40,200 consenting and training on the scoring 132 00:05:45,110 --> 00:05:42,240 procedures is blind to which mediums are 133 00:05:47,089 --> 00:05:45,120 going to read which sitters which item 134 00:05:49,940 --> 00:05:47,099 lists go with which discarnates 135 00:05:53,210 --> 00:05:49,950 etcetera the experimenter who interacts 136 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:53,220 with the medium is blinded that's me is 137 00:05:56,510 --> 00:05:54,930 blinded to all information about the 138 00:05:58,760 --> 00:05:56,520 sitters and the discard it's beyond the 139 00:06:00,710 --> 00:05:58,770 first name of the discarnates and then 140 00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:00,720 the third experimenter who interacts 141 00:06:04,719 --> 00:06:02,490 with the sitters during scoring is 142 00:06:07,159 --> 00:06:04,729 blinded to witches which are the target 143 00:06:09,770 --> 00:06:07,169 and which is the decoy for each sitter 144 00:06:11,900 --> 00:06:09,780 which mediums perform which readings etc 145 00:06:14,990 --> 00:06:11,910 so everybody pretty much is blind to 146 00:06:17,540 --> 00:06:15,000 everything and this quintuple blind 147 00:06:20,860 --> 00:06:17,550 protocol controls for all the normal 148 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:20,870 explanations that so-called skeptics 149 00:06:26,270 --> 00:06:23,970 site as being explanations for the 150 00:06:28,310 --> 00:06:26,280 accuracy of medium statements 151 00:06:31,790 --> 00:06:28,320 it can't be fraud because there's no way 152 00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:31,800 this medium can you know search through 153 00:06:34,940 --> 00:06:33,210 the trash for your credit card number 154 00:06:36,500 --> 00:06:34,950 all they have is the first name of the 155 00:06:39,230 --> 00:06:36,510 deceased person 156 00:06:40,089 --> 00:06:39,240 I can't cue the medium I can't steer the 157 00:06:43,749 --> 00:06:40,099 reading 158 00:06:45,249 --> 00:06:43,759 even if I wanted to we joke the medium 159 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:45,259 can say I'm getting pain in my head I 160 00:06:50,379 --> 00:06:46,970 think that there's and I can't say do 161 00:06:52,510 --> 00:06:50,389 you mean kidney cancer I can't I can't 162 00:06:56,589 --> 00:06:52,520 do that because I only have the first 163 00:06:58,149 --> 00:06:56,599 name so cueing is out 164 00:06:59,740 --> 00:06:58,159 it can't be cold reading since the 165 00:07:04,719 --> 00:06:59,750 medium and the sitter never interact 166 00:07:06,969 --> 00:07:04,729 with each other the statements some one 167 00:07:08,439 --> 00:07:06,979 explanation that skeptics cite is oh the 168 00:07:10,480 --> 00:07:08,449 statements are so general they could 169 00:07:12,029 --> 00:07:10,490 apply to anyone all she said was their 170 00:07:14,710 --> 00:07:12,039 person misses you and they love you and 171 00:07:17,589 --> 00:07:14,720 but we specifically asked the medium to 172 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:17,599 answer questions so they it can't be 173 00:07:22,589 --> 00:07:20,210 general because we we sort of force them 174 00:07:26,170 --> 00:07:22,599 to answer these specific questions and 175 00:07:27,969 --> 00:07:26,180 then rater biases out because the 176 00:07:30,010 --> 00:07:27,979 sitters rate the readings without 177 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:30,020 knowing which one is theirs and then we 178 00:07:34,779 --> 00:07:32,930 look at the difference in a raters score 179 00:07:38,529 --> 00:07:34,789 of the target reading and and their 180 00:07:40,930 --> 00:07:38,539 score of the decoy reading in addition 181 00:07:44,709 --> 00:07:40,940 we never give the mediums any feedback 182 00:07:47,170 --> 00:07:44,719 during this study so it begins to 183 00:07:48,700 --> 00:07:47,180 address precognition as explanatory for 184 00:07:50,770 --> 00:07:48,710 the results because we don't give them 185 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:50,780 any feedback they can't look into a 186 00:07:56,409 --> 00:07:52,370 future time in which we told them which 187 00:07:58,570 --> 00:07:56,419 items were correct so let's talk about 188 00:08:01,240 --> 00:07:58,580 some data the data that I'll talk about 189 00:08:03,580 --> 00:08:01,250 today is from an ongoing study 14 190 00:08:06,580 --> 00:08:03,590 certified mediums have participated for 191 00:08:09,430 --> 00:08:06,590 a total of 28 readings exceeding 2,000 192 00:08:13,330 --> 00:08:09,440 items each reading was between 31 and 193 00:08:14,740 --> 00:08:13,340 131 items with a mean of 74 of the 194 00:08:17,830 --> 00:08:14,750 twenty eight pairs of readings that we 195 00:08:20,620 --> 00:08:17,840 sent out for scoring only 23 pairs came 196 00:08:22,689 --> 00:08:20,630 back and only 21 had usable data so 197 00:08:27,279 --> 00:08:22,699 we'll talk about those 21 pairs of data 198 00:08:29,860 --> 00:08:27,289 today so for the overall score that the 199 00:08:32,769 --> 00:08:29,870 sitters gave the whole reading the the 200 00:08:34,300 --> 00:08:32,779 average score given to target readings 201 00:08:36,010 --> 00:08:34,310 was significantly higher than the 202 00:08:39,610 --> 00:08:36,020 average score given to decoy readings 203 00:08:44,220 --> 00:08:39,620 the p-value is point zero zero one it's 204 00:08:48,460 --> 00:08:44,230 a high P rep and a large effect size and 205 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:48,470 then a 16 of 21 people chose the target 206 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:51,050 reading as their own again a significant 207 00:08:56,300 --> 00:08:53,010 p-value of 0.01 208 00:08:58,639 --> 00:08:56,310 and if we look at overall all of the 209 00:09:01,250 --> 00:08:58,649 items in each reading the the overall 210 00:09:03,050 --> 00:09:01,260 percent accuracy the score is given to 211 00:09:04,970 --> 00:09:03,060 the target readings were significantly 212 00:09:07,699 --> 00:09:04,980 higher than the scores given to decoy 213 00:09:09,170 --> 00:09:07,709 readings again without knowing which was 214 00:09:12,230 --> 00:09:09,180 which when the sitter's did the scoring 215 00:09:15,259 --> 00:09:12,240 the p-value is point zero one for that 216 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:15,269 with a relatively high P rep and a 217 00:09:21,350 --> 00:09:18,930 medium effect size and if we look at the 218 00:09:25,509 --> 00:09:21,360 item percent accuracy by those four 219 00:09:27,949 --> 00:09:25,519 questions that we asked the the target 220 00:09:30,860 --> 00:09:27,959 percent accuracy was higher than the 221 00:09:33,710 --> 00:09:30,870 decoy for physical description and 222 00:09:36,340 --> 00:09:33,720 hobbies quite significantly point zero 223 00:09:40,490 --> 00:09:36,350 zero eight and point zero zero zero six 224 00:09:42,290 --> 00:09:40,500 it just hit a significant four cause of 225 00:09:44,629 --> 00:09:42,300 death at point zero five it approached 226 00:09:48,620 --> 00:09:44,639 significant for personality at point 227 00:09:50,509 --> 00:09:48,630 zero six some other data that I looked 228 00:09:52,879 --> 00:09:50,519 at was the relationship between the 229 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:52,889 overall score and the percent accuracy 230 00:09:59,079 --> 00:09:55,410 and there was a high degree of relation 231 00:10:01,670 --> 00:09:59,089 so it appears that the overall score is 232 00:10:05,329 --> 00:10:01,680 indicative of the overall percent 233 00:10:08,870 --> 00:10:05,339 accuracy of a reading that one score 234 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:08,880 does seem to mean something I also 235 00:10:11,949 --> 00:10:10,170 looked at if there was a relationship 236 00:10:15,350 --> 00:10:11,959 between the items her reading and 237 00:10:18,139 --> 00:10:15,360 accuracy I had thought that the shorter 238 00:10:21,199 --> 00:10:18,149 readings wrote be more accurate but then 239 00:10:23,030 --> 00:10:21,209 I thought I think that's because those 240 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:23,040 are so much easier to perform and 241 00:10:28,009 --> 00:10:26,490 transcribe the ones 31 items versus the 242 00:10:30,139 --> 00:10:28,019 ones with a hundred and thirty-one items 243 00:10:31,879 --> 00:10:30,149 so I think that was my own personal bias 244 00:10:34,490 --> 00:10:31,889 and when I ran the numbers it didn't it 245 00:10:36,290 --> 00:10:34,500 didn't turn out so the number of items 246 00:10:41,689 --> 00:10:36,300 her reading was not related to overall 247 00:10:44,030 --> 00:10:41,699 score or percent accuracy so these data 248 00:10:46,189 --> 00:10:44,040 all support the existence of the 249 00:10:48,259 --> 00:10:46,199 phenomena we call anomalous information 250 00:10:50,420 --> 00:10:48,269 reception or AI R which is the 251 00:10:51,980 --> 00:10:50,430 phenomenon where certain mediums can 252 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:51,990 report accurate and specific information 253 00:10:57,290 --> 00:10:55,290 about deceased individuals with no prior 254 00:11:00,559 --> 00:10:57,300 knowledge about the deceased people or 255 00:11:02,809 --> 00:11:00,569 the sitters with no feedback during or 256 00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:02,819 in this case after the reading either 257 00:11:06,750 --> 00:11:05,250 and without using fraud or deception 258 00:11:09,090 --> 00:11:06,760 so the 259 00:11:11,490 --> 00:11:09,100 this data is indicative of some sort of 260 00:11:13,530 --> 00:11:11,500 non-local transfer of information about 261 00:11:16,220 --> 00:11:13,540 deceased people but we keep with this 262 00:11:18,500 --> 00:11:16,230 data we cannot say that it comes from 263 00:11:22,379 --> 00:11:18,510 deceased people so there are two 264 00:11:26,819 --> 00:11:22,389 prevailing head-to-head arguments about 265 00:11:28,319 --> 00:11:26,829 what it is so on the one hand survival 266 00:11:30,269 --> 00:11:28,329 of consciousness the deceased people 267 00:11:32,160 --> 00:11:30,279 have survived the death of their bodies 268 00:11:34,110 --> 00:11:32,170 and they are communicating with the 269 00:11:36,329 --> 00:11:34,120 mediums just like you or I would 270 00:11:38,759 --> 00:11:36,339 communicate with them and then on the 271 00:11:41,220 --> 00:11:38,769 other hand is the explanation of sigh 272 00:11:44,340 --> 00:11:41,230 the medium is using telepathy or 273 00:11:47,730 --> 00:11:44,350 clairvoyance to get the information 274 00:11:50,129 --> 00:11:47,740 about the deceased people and we can 275 00:11:53,189 --> 00:11:50,139 collect this type of data till the end 276 00:11:55,530 --> 00:11:53,199 of time it will never let us distinguish 277 00:11:58,079 --> 00:11:55,540 between those two items the content of 278 00:12:00,420 --> 00:11:58,089 the information can never let us 279 00:12:02,129 --> 00:12:00,430 determine the source we can always say 280 00:12:03,860 --> 00:12:02,139 it's anomalous they got it from 281 00:12:06,870 --> 00:12:03,870 somewhere that wasn't through local 282 00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:06,880 sensory means that we can't discern the 283 00:12:11,819 --> 00:12:09,490 source from the content we get a lot of 284 00:12:14,850 --> 00:12:11,829 emails from people saying I have solved 285 00:12:17,069 --> 00:12:14,860 this survival versus I debate I I did it 286 00:12:19,829 --> 00:12:17,079 I know how to do it and these are the 287 00:12:21,689 --> 00:12:19,839 things that they usually say I a medium 288 00:12:23,610 --> 00:12:21,699 reported to me information I didn't know 289 00:12:25,530 --> 00:12:23,620 at the time but later I looked at I 290 00:12:27,389 --> 00:12:25,540 could I was able to verify and I looked 291 00:12:29,699 --> 00:12:27,399 it up or I talked to people and indeed 292 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:29,709 it was true so that's clearly survived 293 00:12:34,470 --> 00:12:32,290 nope that's precognition I can easily be 294 00:12:37,110 --> 00:12:34,480 explained as precognition because once 295 00:12:40,470 --> 00:12:37,120 you verify it now it exists now you know 296 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:40,480 it so that can it still can fall under 297 00:12:45,840 --> 00:12:44,170 the Sai heading the other one is oh the 298 00:12:48,329 --> 00:12:45,850 media reported information that only the 299 00:12:50,670 --> 00:12:48,339 discarnate knew but then you have to 300 00:12:53,819 --> 00:12:50,680 look it up to verify it and at that 301 00:12:56,879 --> 00:12:53,829 point it it is now in the in the pool 302 00:12:59,250 --> 00:12:56,889 for precognition to to get a hold of it 303 00:13:01,769 --> 00:12:59,260 and then even in with physical 304 00:13:07,220 --> 00:13:01,779 mediumship which we do not study yet at 305 00:13:10,319 --> 00:13:07,230 the Wynn Byrd Institute so it's not 306 00:13:12,319 --> 00:13:10,329 people will report physical mediumship 307 00:13:14,850 --> 00:13:12,329 as evidence of survival but it 308 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:14,860 psychokinesis is also an explanation 309 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:18,610 that could be put forth for that however 310 00:13:22,769 --> 00:13:20,290 though the content of 311 00:13:24,689 --> 00:13:22,779 information cannot help us distinguish 312 00:13:27,329 --> 00:13:24,699 between the two the mediums actual 313 00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:27,339 experiences can so historically 314 00:13:32,550 --> 00:13:29,290 mediumship research involves trance 315 00:13:34,079 --> 00:13:32,560 mediums who were unconscious and a 316 00:13:37,470 --> 00:13:34,089 spirit entity took over the body and 317 00:13:41,340 --> 00:13:37,480 talked through the mediums physiology 318 00:13:42,389 --> 00:13:41,350 and anatomy and so they had no conscious 319 00:13:44,300 --> 00:13:42,399 recollection of what was happening 320 00:13:46,980 --> 00:13:44,310 during the readings the mediums today 321 00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:46,990 are that we work with our mental mediums 322 00:13:52,470 --> 00:13:49,810 so they have full they're fully 323 00:13:56,490 --> 00:13:52,480 conscious during the readings and their 324 00:13:57,900 --> 00:13:56,500 experiences are during part of their 325 00:14:00,090 --> 00:13:57,910 services they ought that they offer to 326 00:14:03,689 --> 00:14:00,100 clients they do psychic readings for the 327 00:14:05,730 --> 00:14:03,699 living so they know what's I feels like 328 00:14:07,680 --> 00:14:05,740 and according to their reports this 329 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:07,690 feels different and this feels like 330 00:14:13,170 --> 00:14:11,410 communication and so we have engaged in 331 00:14:15,420 --> 00:14:13,180 an entire research program where we're 332 00:14:18,090 --> 00:14:15,430 we're systematically looking at the 333 00:14:20,670 --> 00:14:18,100 mediums experiences during one study a 334 00:14:22,379 --> 00:14:20,680 medium concisely put it a psychic 335 00:14:24,389 --> 00:14:22,389 reading is like reading a book and a 336 00:14:26,460 --> 00:14:24,399 mediumship reading is like seeing a play 337 00:14:29,730 --> 00:14:26,470 so they're very very different 338 00:14:30,780 --> 00:14:29,740 experiences so the mediums personally in 339 00:14:33,660 --> 00:14:30,790 their personal experience they can 340 00:14:36,900 --> 00:14:33,670 clearly distinguish between survival and 341 00:14:38,430 --> 00:14:36,910 sigh so again we have a an entire 342 00:14:40,949 --> 00:14:38,440 research program dedicated to look 343 00:14:42,990 --> 00:14:40,959 systematically looking at the the 344 00:14:45,090 --> 00:14:43,000 experiences of the mediums that's a 345 00:14:47,819 --> 00:14:45,100 story for another day I only had 15 346 00:14:49,259 --> 00:14:47,829 minutes I do have some handouts if 347 00:14:50,910 --> 00:14:49,269 you're interested you can grab a handout 348 00:14:54,329 --> 00:14:50,920 for me or there's a lot of information 349 00:14:55,949 --> 00:14:54,339 on our on our website about this so at 350 00:14:57,930 --> 00:14:55,959 this time we cannot answer these 351 00:14:59,069 --> 00:14:57,940 questions are mediums communicating with 352 00:15:01,949 --> 00:14:59,079 the deceased or do they get their 353 00:15:03,629 --> 00:15:01,959 information using SCI and Ken the mind 354 00:15:06,059 --> 00:15:03,639 exists without the body is there life 355 00:15:07,610 --> 00:15:06,069 after death 356 00:15:10,949 --> 00:15:07,620 I want to thank the other Windridge 357 00:15:13,259 --> 00:15:10,959 researchers mark Adam Mike and Chad 358 00:15:17,189 --> 00:15:13,269 especially Chad since he is currently at 359 00:15:18,990 --> 00:15:17,199 our house babysitting our sweet dog I'd 360 00:15:20,790 --> 00:15:19,000 want to thank the SSC for having me all 361 00:15:22,620 --> 00:15:20,800 the Windward certified research mediums 362 00:15:24,569 --> 00:15:22,630 who participated the Wynn Birds 363 00:15:27,150 --> 00:15:24,579 Institute scientific advisory board the 364 00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:27,160 bee owl foundation and the wind Birds 365 00:15:31,559 --> 00:15:29,410 Institute members for their support and 366 00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:31,569 thank you all for your attention and I'm 367 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:33,210 happy to take any questions 368 00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:37,290 [Applause] 369 00:15:42,260 --> 00:15:39,850 Thank You Julie we have a five minutes 370 00:15:45,030 --> 00:15:42,270 for question we'll begin with mark 371 00:15:46,740 --> 00:15:45,040 thanks Julia interesting talk I just had 372 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:46,750 another question about your protocol 373 00:15:51,600 --> 00:15:49,570 obviously good attention to blinding do 374 00:15:53,220 --> 00:15:51,610 the sitters know that one of these 375 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:53,230 readings that they're going to look at 376 00:15:56,280 --> 00:15:54,610 is the quote real one and one of they 377 00:15:57,660 --> 00:15:56,290 control could they both be controls but 378 00:15:59,340 --> 00:15:57,670 they both be quote real from different 379 00:16:01,470 --> 00:15:59,350 mediums what do they know about that we 380 00:16:03,150 --> 00:16:01,480 tell them that one is intended for them 381 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:03,160 and one is not 382 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:04,690 but without fail I get a lot of 383 00:16:08,310 --> 00:16:06,610 responses up neither of these mediums 384 00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:08,320 talked to my person so not only do they 385 00:16:14,700 --> 00:16:12,250 not recognize or they not remember or 386 00:16:16,110 --> 00:16:14,710 understand that not only is it one 387 00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:16,120 medium doing both of those readings but 388 00:16:21,180 --> 00:16:18,090 only one was even supposed to be yours 389 00:16:23,190 --> 00:16:21,190 so I we do tell them one of these is 390 00:16:26,550 --> 00:16:23,200 yours because when we say pick which one 391 00:16:28,080 --> 00:16:26,560 you think is yours that it would give it 392 00:16:30,330 --> 00:16:28,090 away at that point so we do tell them 393 00:16:35,040 --> 00:16:30,340 you're gonna score them each as to how 394 00:16:38,700 --> 00:16:35,050 they apply to your person but only one 395 00:16:40,440 --> 00:16:38,710 of them was during one only one was it 396 00:16:43,590 --> 00:16:40,450 the name of your person actually given 397 00:16:47,840 --> 00:16:46,140 Kathleen Barrett did a dissertation that 398 00:16:51,090 --> 00:16:47,850 looked not only on the phenomenological 399 00:16:53,340 --> 00:16:51,100 experience of mediums but also of the 400 00:16:54,570 --> 00:16:53,350 beans they were channeling oh wow which 401 00:16:57,270 --> 00:16:54,580 is interesting so you may want to look 402 00:16:59,190 --> 00:16:57,280 at that dissertation the fact that you 403 00:17:00,960 --> 00:16:59,200 had the lowest score rate on personality 404 00:17:03,210 --> 00:17:00,970 is to me the strongest evidence I've 405 00:17:05,850 --> 00:17:03,220 ever seen that this is coming from a dis 406 00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:05,860 Carnot source because generally speaking 407 00:17:10,380 --> 00:17:08,050 people have a very poor concept of their 408 00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:10,390 own personality and if it's a stranger 409 00:17:13,140 --> 00:17:12,250 who's and analyzed unit they're more apt 410 00:17:15,150 --> 00:17:13,150 to be accurate 411 00:17:17,400 --> 00:17:15,160 that's so indirectly that's the most 412 00:17:19,020 --> 00:17:17,410 strong evidence I've seen that you're 413 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:19,030 actually getting it from the source 414 00:17:22,650 --> 00:17:20,770 because when we saw it we thought the 415 00:17:24,780 --> 00:17:22,660 opposite like oh no this is very 416 00:17:27,360 --> 00:17:24,790 indicative of side because it's they're 417 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:27,370 not getting the yeah that's really 418 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:28,330 interesting I hadn't thought it thank 419 00:17:32,790 --> 00:17:29,170 you for that 420 00:17:35,460 --> 00:17:32,800 that way the notion of mediumship is 421 00:17:39,180 --> 00:17:35,470 communication involved implies that the 422 00:17:42,780 --> 00:17:39,190 discarnate is cooperating in the process 423 00:17:45,330 --> 00:17:42,790 somehow have you thought of addressing 424 00:17:47,220 --> 00:17:45,340 the survival versus I hypothesis by 425 00:17:49,169 --> 00:17:47,230 looking at the 426 00:17:52,020 --> 00:17:49,179 a belief system philosophy or religion 427 00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:52,030 of the discarnate to see if there's a 428 00:17:56,430 --> 00:17:54,210 difference in accuracy rates between 429 00:17:59,430 --> 00:17:56,440 discarnates who might be expected to 430 00:18:01,260 --> 00:17:59,440 accurate actively cooperate versus those 431 00:18:04,860 --> 00:18:01,270 who given their beliefs in life would 432 00:18:08,520 --> 00:18:04,870 probably resist or be hostile when we 433 00:18:10,350 --> 00:18:08,530 screen sitters we ask a question because 434 00:18:11,940 --> 00:18:10,360 we want to optimize in addition to 435 00:18:13,409 --> 00:18:11,950 maximizing controls we want to optimize 436 00:18:15,690 --> 00:18:13,419 the condition so people say well you 437 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:15,700 know why don't you use skeptics and 438 00:18:20,220 --> 00:18:18,250 sitters well if I was dead and you were 439 00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:20,230 saying to me this is all bunk 440 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:22,210 I want to hear from Julie why would I 441 00:18:26,340 --> 00:18:24,010 waste my time coming to talk to you so 442 00:18:27,780 --> 00:18:26,350 that doesn't optimize the process so one 443 00:18:30,600 --> 00:18:27,790 of the other things that we do is we ask 444 00:18:34,890 --> 00:18:30,610 the sitter's you know do you think in 445 00:18:36,510 --> 00:18:34,900 your opinion do you think this person 446 00:18:38,310 --> 00:18:36,520 will want to come and talk to you and 447 00:18:43,740 --> 00:18:38,320 and we only work with the people whose 448 00:18:46,740 --> 00:18:43,750 answer yes but just anecdotally we do 449 00:18:48,210 --> 00:18:46,750 get when we ask for personality and you 450 00:18:49,860 --> 00:18:48,220 know a lot of spontaneous things come up 451 00:18:52,080 --> 00:18:49,870 that don't fall into these categories of 452 00:18:54,330 --> 00:18:52,090 these questions we do often hear like 453 00:18:56,460 --> 00:18:54,340 yeah this person would not have thought 454 00:18:58,710 --> 00:18:56,470 would not have been cool with this at 455 00:19:01,650 --> 00:18:58,720 all when they were alive so 456 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:01,660 spontaneously we are getting that some 457 00:19:05,490 --> 00:19:03,970 people you know and the same thing with 458 00:19:07,740 --> 00:19:05,500 oh they were really into this sort of 459 00:19:10,340 --> 00:19:07,750 thing when they were alive so we do get 460 00:19:13,110 --> 00:19:10,350 both sides and I haven't looked at 461 00:19:18,480 --> 00:19:13,120 correlating that with accuracy but I 462 00:19:22,350 --> 00:19:18,490 have seen both it seems clear that the 463 00:19:24,900 --> 00:19:22,360 sitters have the sense that the reading 464 00:19:27,020 --> 00:19:24,910 that they're getting addresses the 465 00:19:30,000 --> 00:19:27,030 specific person they're interested in I 466 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:30,010 wonder if you could share with us some 467 00:19:36,450 --> 00:19:33,210 of the experiences that the sitters have 468 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:36,460 upon hearing not just identification 469 00:19:41,810 --> 00:19:38,770 material but messages as it were 470 00:19:45,630 --> 00:19:41,820 communications from the disc Arnott and 471 00:19:49,110 --> 00:19:45,640 really kind of what the personal or 472 00:19:51,330 --> 00:19:49,120 spiritual value is that they take from 473 00:19:55,799 --> 00:19:51,340 the experience of receiving this 474 00:19:59,250 --> 00:19:55,809 communication this is also very blinded 475 00:20:01,090 --> 00:19:59,260 that it's all through email so the 476 00:20:02,710 --> 00:20:01,100 sitter's just get sent the readings 477 00:20:05,500 --> 00:20:02,720 then they can make comments and send 478 00:20:09,010 --> 00:20:05,510 them back but we're not looking at those 479 00:20:10,150 --> 00:20:09,020 specifically and we do have a third of 480 00:20:12,010 --> 00:20:10,160 research program that we're interested 481 00:20:14,470 --> 00:20:12,020 in where we look at the effect of 482 00:20:16,390 --> 00:20:14,480 mediumship readings on grief so we have 483 00:20:17,650 --> 00:20:16,400 we have an entire research program to 484 00:20:19,020 --> 00:20:17,660 look at that and I've handouts for that 485 00:20:21,789 --> 00:20:19,030 too if anyone wants to look at that 486 00:20:25,270 --> 00:20:21,799 where we're looking at the effect on the